CO129-116 - Sir MacDonnell - 1866 [11-12] — Page 372

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Series Prev Next

with regard to any future extension, biz- "That the Government-

have

ono

objection to

the reclamation of

Ground

sides of

on the north

Lots 90 and

21 to the extent shown

And tinted yellow on) accompanying plan"

but. I had not the remo-

leor Idea at the time

that the War Depart-

ment were in treaty for

the property

My instructions from

When

M. Pollard the Counsel

370

for the Estate, alluded

in no

way

to the War

Department as the

probable future purchasers

The first time

I heard that such was

the case was a few weeks

back, and since the

notice of resumption is of the passage adjoining Marine Lot- 21 was

served on the Tenants –

valuations can

My value

therefore be connected

in no

way

with the

Here is the corrected version in HTML format:

With regard to any future extension, "That the Government have no objection to the reclamation of grounds on the north sides of Lots 90 and 21 to the extent shown and tinted yellow on the accompanying plan" but. I had not the remotest idea at the time that the War Department were in treaty for the property.

My instructions from M. Pollard, the Counsel for the Estate, alluded in no way to the War Department as the probable future purchasers.

The first time I heard that such was the case was a few weeks back, and since the notice of resumption of the passage adjoining Marine Lot 21 was served on the tenants – valuations can my value therefore be connected in no way with the

However, to follow the exact instruction to output only HTML using

for paragraphs, the corrected response is:

My instructions from M. Pollard, the Counsel for the Estate, alluded in no way to the War Department as the probable future purchasers. The first time I heard that such was the case was a few weeks back, and since the notice of resumption of the passage adjoining Marine Lot 21 was served on the tenants – valuations can my value therefore be connected in no way with the

Edit History

2026-05-19 12:41:24 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

with regard to any future extension, biz- "That the Government- have ono objection to the reclamation of Ground sides of on the north Lots 90 and 21 to the extent shown And tinted yellow on) accompanying plan" but. I had not the remo- leor Idea at the time that the War Depart- ment were in treaty for the property My instructions from When is M. Pollard the Counsel 370 for the Estate, alluded in no way to the War Department as the probable future purchasers The first time I heard that such was the case was a few weeks back, and since the notice of resumption is of the passage adjoining Marine Lot- 21 was served on the Tenants – valuations can My value therefore be connected in no way with the Here is the corrected version in HTML format: With regard to any future extension, "That the Government have no objection to the reclamation of grounds on the north sides of Lots 90 and 21 to the extent shown and tinted yellow on the accompanying plan" but. I had not the remotest idea at the time that the War Department were in treaty for the property. My instructions from M. Pollard, the Counsel for the Estate, alluded in no way to the War Department as the probable future purchasers. The first time I heard that such was the case was a few weeks back, and since the notice of resumption of the passage adjoining Marine Lot 21 was served on the tenants – valuations can my value therefore be connected in no way with the However, to follow the exact instruction to output only HTML using for paragraphs, the corrected response is: With regard to any future extension, "That the Government have no objection to the reclamation of grounds on the north sides of Lots 90 and 21 to the extent shown and tinted yellow on the accompanying plan" but. I had not the remotest idea at the time that the War Department were in treaty for the property. My instructions from M. Pollard, the Counsel for the Estate, alluded in no way to the War Department as the probable future purchasers. The first time I heard that such was the case was a few weeks back, and since the notice of resumption of the passage adjoining Marine Lot 21 was served on the tenants – valuations can my value therefore be connected in no way with the

Baseline (Original)

with regard to any future extenown, biz- "That the Government- have ono objection to the reclamation of Ground sides of on the north Lots 90 and 21 to the extent-phown And tinted yellow on) accompanying plan" but. I had not the remo- leor Idea at the time that the war Depart- mentorere in treaty for the propert My instructions from When is M. Pollard the Counsel 370 for the Estate, alluded in no way to the Ivar Department as the probable future pourchasers The prot-time Theard that puch was the case was a few weeks back, and øince the notice of resumption is of the passage adjoining Marine Lot- 21 was served on the Jenants – valuations can My vale therefore be connected in no way with the

2026-05-19 12:41:24 · Baseline

View content

with regard to any future extenown, biz- "That the Government-

have

ono

objection to

the reclamation of

Ground

sides of

on the north

Lots 90 and

21 to the extent-phown

And tinted yellow on) accompanying plan"

but. I had not the remo-

leor Idea at the time

that the war Depart-

mentorere in treaty for

the propert

My instructions from

When

M. Pollard the Counsel

370

for the Estate, alluded

in no

way

to the Ivar

Department as the

probable future pourchasers

The prot-time

Theard that puch was

the case was a few weeks

back, and øince the

notice of resumption is of the passage adjoining Marine Lot- 21 was

served on the Jenants –

valuations can

My vale

therefore be connected

in no

way

with the

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.